By - Michael Schrage
Category - Projects
Source - http://www.linkedin.com
Call them "projeclications" or "applijects." World-class talent will engage in bespoke real-world projects testing their abilities to deliver real value on their own and with others. Forget the "What's Your Greatest Weakness?" interrogatory genre; the real question will be how well candidates can rise to the "appliject" challenge and help redesign a social media campaign, document a tricky bit of software, edit a Keynote presentation, produce a webinar or peer review a CAD layout for a contract Chinese manufacturer.
Source - http://www.linkedin.com/news?actionBar=&articleID=5607262531056832548&ids=d3kMcPcQe34Ue3ASe3wUdP0SdiMQdj4Mc3wOe30VczwPcjsSc3oRb3wQdj8Pe3oRc34Pdj8SczsMdzkIe3cMcjkScPAUczcRcjkSdj0SdiMRcj8Uc3AOc3wUe3sUc3gTc3oR&aag=true&freq=weekly&trk=eml-tod2-b-ttl-2&ut=0siAqqr0Dm3Bg1
Category - Projects
Source - http://www.linkedin.com
![]() |
| Projects |
Resumes are dead. Interviews are largely ineffectual. Linked-In is good. Portfolios are useful.
But projects are the real future of hiring, especially knowledge
working hiring. No matter how wonderful your references or how well you
do on those too-clever-by-half Microsoft/Google brainteasers, serious firms will increasingly ask serious candidates to do serious work in order to get a serious job offer.
Call them "projeclications" or "applijects." World-class talent will engage in bespoke real-world projects testing their abilities to deliver real value on their own and with others. Forget the "What's Your Greatest Weakness?" interrogatory genre; the real question will be how well candidates can rise to the "appliject" challenge and help redesign a social media campaign, document a tricky bit of software, edit a Keynote presentation, produce a webinar or peer review a CAD layout for a contract Chinese manufacturer.
Exploitive? Perhaps. But most organizations have learned the hard way
that no amount of interviewing, reference checking and/or psychological
testing is a substitute for actually working with a candidate on a real
project. I know advertising agencies that have an iron-clad, inviolable
rule that they will only hire creatives who have successfully done
freelance work with an account team. Similarly, a fast-growing Web 2.0
"software as a service" company doesn't waste its time asking coding
candidates trick "Python"
questions during job interviews; they have potential hires participate
in at least two "code reviews" to see what kinds of contributors,
collaborators and critics they might be.
Yes, candidates must sign NDAs. Yes, sometimes these sessions
effectively pit a couple or three candidates against each other. But
there's nothing fake or artificial about the value they're expected to
offer. These organizations treat hiring as part of their on-boarding
process. Hiring becomes more holistic rather than "over the wall." More
importantly, everyone in the enterprise now "gets" that people only get
hired if and only if they deliver something above and beyond a decent
track record and social graph.
Ethically, the most interesting behavior I've observed is that firms
exploring "projeclication" hires aren't asking for free labor. They're
paying below-market rates for their candidate's insights and efforts. If
I were a 20-something coder or a forty-something marketer, I'd
undeniably have mixed feelings about giving my best efforts for discount
compensation. That said, it's worth something to know what it's like to
really work with one's colleagues on a real project as opposed to the
all-too-misleading charade of iterative interviews. To my mind, this
approach is an order of magnitude more ethical than the "free" and
unpaid internship infrastructure that has gotten so out of control in so
many industries.
But just as many organizations have grown more skillful conducting
Skyped interviews and using web-based quizzes and questionnaires as
qualifying screens for candidates, my bet is we'll soon see new genres
of project-based hiring shape enterprise human capital portfolios.
Facebook and Linked-In are obvious venues for "app-sourced" — that's
"app" as in applicant, not application— business project design.
Increasingly, project leaders will design milestones and metrics that
make incorporating job candidates into the process more seamless and
natural. College graduates, MBAs and older job candidates will learn how
to sniff out which "applijects" are genuine invitations to success and
which ones are sleazy bids for cheap labor. In the same way job
candidates learn how to interview well, they'll get the skills to
"appliject" well because they understand how to optimize their influence
and impact within the constraints of the project design.
Ultimately, the reason why I'm confident that "projects are the new
job interviews" is not simply because I'm observing a nascent trend but
because this appears to be a more efficient and effective mechanism for
companies and candidates to gain the true measure of each other.
Designing great applijects and projeclications will be a craft and art.
The most successful utilizers will quickly be copied. Why? Because the
brightest and most talented people typically like having real-world
opportunities to shine and succeed.
Should your next hire come from a great set of interviews and references? Or from knocking your socks off on a project?
Source - http://www.linkedin.com/news?actionBar=&articleID=5607262531056832548&ids=d3kMcPcQe34Ue3ASe3wUdP0SdiMQdj4Mc3wOe30VczwPcjsSc3oRb3wQdj8Pe3oRc34Pdj8SczsMdzkIe3cMcjkScPAUczcRcjkSdj0SdiMRcj8Uc3AOc3wUe3sUc3gTc3oR&aag=true&freq=weekly&trk=eml-tod2-b-ttl-2&ut=0siAqqr0Dm3Bg1

No comments:
Post a Comment